Behind the News

AOC-Backed Chris Rabb Tests Democrats’ Israel Divide In Pennsylvania Race

The Philadelphia Democrat remains competitive in a safe House race, raising questions about whether anti-Israel politics now help rather than hurt on the progressive left

Screenshot/XScreenshot/X
aA

Chris Rabb, a progressive Pennsylvania Democrat backed by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, remains competitive in a congressional primary that is now testing how much Israel-related controversy matters on the Democratic left.

Rabb is running in Pennsylvania’s 3rd Congressional District, a heavily Democratic Philadelphia-area seat being vacated by Rep. Dwight Evans. The May 19 Democratic primary is expected to decide the next member of Congress from the district, making the race more than a symbolic fight between party factions.

The question is simple: can a candidate with a hard anti-Israel record and a recent controversy over a post about Jews still win a safe Democratic seat? If Rabb wins, it would not prove voters chose him only because of Israel. But it would show that such controversies are not necessarily enough to stop a progressive candidate in a deep-blue district.

Ocasio-Cortez has endorsed Rabb, fundraised for him, and is expected to campaign in Philadelphia before the primary, according to local reporting. Her support gave Rabb the most high-profile national endorsement in the race and placed him firmly in the progressive lane.

Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, who is Jewish and is seen as a possible future Democratic presidential contender, has taken the opposite view behind the scenes. Axios reported that Shapiro has privately tried to block Rabb’s path, though he has not publicly endorsed or opposed a candidate. Shapiro’s spokesman said the governor “looks forward to working directly with whoever wins” the primary.

The controversy around Rabb is concrete. According to the Philadelphia Inquirer, Rabb disavowed an Instagram post from his account that suggested the Bondi Beach attack on Jews was a false flag carried out by “Zionists.” Jewish Insider reported that the post said, “We all know the gunmen were likely Zionists themselves.” Rabb’s campaign blamed the post on a former staffer and said Rabb condemns antisemitism. 

Rabb has also made Palestinian advocacy part of his campaign message. In an interview with Arab News, Rabb said, “I stand in solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza and oppose the genocide that’s going on there.” Arab News picked up that he pledged to make Palestinian rights a cornerstone of his campaign.

That makes the race different from a normal local primary. Rabb is not simply being accused of holding views he has tried to hide. He is running as a candidate whose progressive identity includes sharp criticism of Israel, opposition to pro-Israel political influence, and support from figures on the party’s left.

Pro-Palestinian activists are also treating the race as a wider political test. According to the Philadelphia Inquirer, some of the sharpest disagreements in the primary center on whether candidates are willing to call Israel’s actions in Gaza “genocide” and how they view the influence of pro-Israel groups in Democratic politics. 

That is why Rabb’s candidacy matters beyond Philadelphia. For years, support for Israel was treated as a safer position in national Democratic politics. But in some progressive spaces, the political calculation appears to be changing. Rabb’s campaign is testing whether a hard anti-Israel stance is still a liability, or whether it has become part of what makes a candidate attractive to left-wing voters.

The answer may come on May 19. If Rabb loses, Democrats may argue that Israel controversies still carry a cost. If he wins, the party will face a sharper question: whether opposition to Israel is no longer a problem on the progressive left, but part of the appeal.

Tags:American politicsDemocratic primaries

Articles you might missed